https://ogma.newcastle.edu.au/vital/access/ /manager/Index ${session.getAttribute("locale")} 5 https://ogma.newcastle.edu.au/vital/access/ /manager/Repository/uon:51676 Wed 13 Sep 2023 15:22:04 AEST ]]> https://ogma.newcastle.edu.au/vital/access/ /manager/Repository/uon:20282 Wed 11 Apr 2018 10:56:59 AEST ]]> https://ogma.newcastle.edu.au/vital/access/ /manager/Repository/uon:37351 Thu 15 Oct 2020 13:23:26 AEDT ]]> https://ogma.newcastle.edu.au/vital/access/ /manager/Repository/uon:52929 n = 606) included people with a lived experience, carers, health care professionals (clinicians) and researchers working in eating disorders. The methodology aligned with the James Lind Alliance priority setting process, which involved oversight by a co-design advisory committee and utilised a national online interim priority setting survey and co-design workshops to identify the top 10 research and translation priorities. Results: The initial national consultations elicited 1210 issues from 480 individuals. From this, 606 participants shortlisted 59 plain language questions in order of personal priority. In total, 16 questions were consistently ranked as important. As a final step, 24 individuals (with equal representation from all 4 stakeholder groups) attended the final prioritisation workshop to co-establish the top 10 research and translation priorities. Conclusion: The findings highlight the need for people with a lived experience, carers, health professionals and researchers to work collaboratively to develop co-designed research and translation activities that address the key areas of early intervention, prevention, understanding the aetiology of eating disorders and effective treatment of people experiencing eating disorders.]]> Thu 02 Nov 2023 09:55:42 AEDT ]]> https://ogma.newcastle.edu.au/vital/access/ /manager/Repository/uon:48473 Fri 17 Mar 2023 17:56:40 AEDT ]]>